Over Representation of African American Students in the Special Education System. Essay

Presentation My present school has custom curriculum program of 32 understudies in self contain with over 90% of the understudies being African-American. This paper will address the enormous number African-American understudies in the custom curriculum framework. Consideration will be center around the social financial jobs that have an influence in arrangement. At the point when done appropriately and in suitable viewpoint, custom curriculum is advantageous for understudies with a genuine inability, yet specialized curriculum administrations are improper when an understudy gets it when it isn't required. African-American understudies are being set in the custom curriculum framework at a disturbing rate. They are being marked with incapacities at ages as right on time as five years of age, since they progress more slow than the remainder of the class, inclination in appraisal instrument, separation in the public arena reflected in the school or they may introduce some conduct issue. Custom curriculum is proper situation for understudies with genuine handicaps, yet minority blacks are as a rule excessively place in a custom curriculum. This treacherous situation at early ages are making these youngsters be generalized as moderate students causing low confidence and low accomplishment rate during and after school. This is a significant issue while tending to a custom curriculum for African Americans. Numerous endeavors have been made to unravel the issues however there have been no agreeable outcomes. Hypothetical Framework The unbalanced portrayal of African-Americans understudies in the custom curriculum framework is very much reported. This distortion has been hazardous since the origin of the specialized curriculum program. This paper will test the reasons huge numbers of these understudies have been sorted with different kind of learning handicaps or enthusiastic aggravations. These names given to understudies have demonstrated to be life changing to understudies given inaccurate situation. Claims have been recorded charging that situations of high quantities of African American, particularly male, in a specialized curriculum classes has been an apparatus for opposing court requested integration (Harry and Anderson, 1992). In numerous occurrences there is an absence of or reluctance to appropriately put African American understudies due to instructors in certain frameworks being socially different. Besides there is a great deal of doubt among instructors and guardians. Numerous guardians don’t look for fitting administrations or can't help contradicting instructive arrangement since they believe they will be see as uninformed or â€Å"talked down† to by educators and overseers setting their youngsters in a specialized curriculum. This paper will likewise talk about the drawn out impacts that frustrate understudies instructive advancement just as there grown-up life. When set in numerous custom curriculum programs understudy may not be in line to get a secondary school confirmation. Numerous understudies experience issues in the network landing positions since bosses feel they will be more slow then there partners that got customary instruction. This at that point snowballs into the kid being put in a lower social monetary section due to the kind of work they should make due with in adulthood. African-American understudies are disproportionally positioned in the custom curriculum framework around the nation. This distortion is might be because of instructor inadequacy. Improving teachers’ ability to give socially responsive guidance to African American understudies resembles to improve understudy learning capacity (Darling-Hammond, 2004). New educators must meet a vivacious undergrad program to become ensured they keep on graduating empower to successfully show African American understudies. Many leave program with a misguided judgment of dark understudies. They feel that the African American understudies are not as brilliant as different races. The motivation behind this investigation is to demonstrate there is a deception of African American understudies in a custom curriculum. I additionally plan to outline the issue of lopsided portrayal of African American understudies in a specialized curriculum isn't only a custom curriculum issue or concern be that as it may, rather, must be seen in the setting as it alludes to prejudice in the entire instructive framework. I will talk about how bigotry adds to and keeps up disproportionality in a custom curriculum by (a) deficiently subsidizing schools went to essentially by African American and poor kids: (b) utilizing socially wrong and inert educational program; (c) insufficiently planning instructors to viably show African American students and different understudies of shading. I will demonstrate that to adequately address the issue of disproportionality, specialists, experts andâ policymakers must place biased instructive asset assignment, unseemly educational program and instructional method and deficient instructor readiness at the focal point of training exploration, strategy, and practice. Importance of the Study There is a lot of hugeness for this investigation. Being a specialized curriculum educator I have seen numerous understudies come to me since they were a social issue during their basic years. I trust it is our duty to discover an answer for this developing issue. To begin with, we as instructors, we have to see whether this race of understudies are get lost in the instructive framework. These understudies not getting appropriate training are causing a negative impact on as long as they can remember. This makes this specific gathering need to rely upon state help and debilitates the workforce. Furthermore, we have to see whether there is an issue with educator readiness. On the off chance that this is a difficult we have to make sense of what should be possible in state schools and colleges to take care of these issues. Would including an all the more morally differing educational plan better get ready educators to instruct African American understudies? Most of the educators coming out of school will spend there initial scarcely any years instructing intercity kids, with the greater part being African Americans. At last we have to instruct or youngsters to be solid profitable residents. I feel that these kids are not being given an equivalent shot at being gainful on the off chance that they are being tossed in the custom curriculum class in the rear of the structure. We definitely know there is an issue, presently we have to cooperate to discover an answer that will best profit the understudies. Meaning of Terms Disproportionate numbers: Having more prominent portrayal inside a subgroupâ compared to the quantity of understudies in the populace all in all. A few specialists use give or take 10% to decide proportionality (Harry and Anderson, 1994). Segregation The capacity to make or see qualification; acumen. Prejudice, or predisposition, in the treatment of an individual or gathering, which is out of line, illicit, etc(Loren and Orfield, 2002). It is my feeling that African American kids are being put in a specialized curriculum in view of predispositions unjustifiable gathering. High Achieving: School-wide direction of API (if in California) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) development more than three years all things considered. There must likewise be a base development of two deciles inside 3-5 years. ] Special Education: Services and supports intended to limit the effect of inability and boost chance to develop and learn (Hehir, 2007). Impediment, Delimitation and Assumptions Limitations of Study The restrictions of this investigation is discover willing takes part, in view of the reasons I have examined before guardians will concede that their kid was set in a specialized curriculum in light of an absence of information on their part. Another constraint that will influence them result of this exploration is on the grounds that I am legitimately utilized in the ward that I have decided to do investigate. This position will restrict the viability of my exploration as a result of understudy protection and my situation in the area. It is additionally my supposition that school regions won't have any desire to discharge data that could conceivable be utilized against them. As expressed before I consider understudies shading or being illicit delegated understudies with unique needs and put in a specialized curriculum. These are a couple of variables that could constrain my investigation. Delimitations of the Study External legitimacy might be affected dependent on the quantity of understudy/guardians being met. Approve might be affected because of other minority races not being remembered for the examination. Additionally the size and school areas may restrict my capacity to get satisfactory information to completely demonstrate my speculation. The little example populace was plausible for my examination rather then wandering out into bigger territories. This is critical in that the discoveries may not be appropriate to different schools. Presumptions of the Study References Artiles, A. J. (2003). Unique education’s evolving personality: Paradoxes and problems in perspectives on culture and space. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 164-202. Artiles, A. J. , Rueda, R. , Salazar, J. J. , and Higareda, I. (2005). Inside gathering decent variety in minority unbalanced portrayal: English language students in urban school areas. Excellent Children, 71, 283-300. Billingsley, B. (2004). Specialized curriculum teachers’ maintenance and wearing down: A basic investigation of the exploration writing. Medicinal and Special Education, 25, 22-39. Blair, C. , and Scott, K. G. (2002). Extent of LD situations related with low financial status: Evidence for inclination. Diary of Special Education, 36, 14-22. Blanchett, W. J. , Mumford, V. , and Beachum, F. (2005). Urban school disappointment and disproportionality in a post-Brown period. Therapeutic and Special Education, 26, 70-81. Chamberlain, S. P. (2005). Issues of overrepresentation and instructive value for socially and phonetically different understudies. Intercession in School and Clinic, 41, 110-113. Countinho, M. J. , Oswald, D. P. , and Best, A. M. (2002). The impact of sociodemographics and sex on the unbalanced recognizable proof of minority understudies as having learning handicaps. Medicinal and Special Education, 23, 49-59. Coutinho, M. J. , Oswald, D. P. , Best,

Antisemitism In Merchant Of Venice Essay Example For Students

Discrimination against Jews In Merchant Of Venice Essay The Merchant of Venice is a dubious play among specialists of Shakespeare. This play has been contended by some to be a satire. This is on the grounds that there is a ton of lighthearted element and the story has a glad completion. Others believe the play to be a catastrophe in view of Shylocks character. He is a lot of like a character of a disaster as in Phaedra. Still different specialists utilize the term tragicomedy. By and by I believe that the last definition is the best one to depict this play. There are a few factors that add to the arrangement of a play as a catastrophe or as a satire. A catastrophe has four principle components as indicated by current definitions. The primary component is the lamentable saint. In The Merchant of Venice Shylock is the main character that can be contended to be such an individual. He is associated with the majority of the activity and is the wellspring of the significant clash. On the off chance that he was absent the play would have no contention and would not make a generally excellent story. Shylock can likewise be viewed as the heartbreaking legend since he has a sad blemish. This is his fixation that is obvious all through the play. His material riches devours his contemplations day and night. He might be a Jewish man yet I believe that the god he reveres the most is known as gold. One case where it is obvious that he possibly thinks about his assets was when Jessica fled. He was fuming, O, my ducats! O, my little girl! Fled with a Christian! O, my Christian ducats 2. 8. 15-16. He just includ! ed his little girl in the center as if she were one of his assets. Another piece of a disaster is that the terrible saint must be lowered or embarrassed. Shylock experienced both of these. He was embarrassed when Portia, camouflaged as a man, utilized his own remarks and agreement against him. Any individual that was from the start commending somebody for being brilliant and righteous must feel extremely moronic when that individual isn't generally on their side like they were by all accounts from the outset. We have not done much in class with what a satire is nevertheless I imagine that I have a not too bad broad information on what one is. The main component that I am aware of is the entertainment. In The Merchant of Venice there is a bounty of such lighthearted element. One model was when Portia and Nerissa got the rings from their spouses to be while they were in Venice. After they got them they prodded the two with dangers and stories including a great deal of sexual silliness. A particular case of the sexual silliness was when Gratiano stated, Well, do you so. Let me not take him, at that point! For on the off chance that I do, Ill blemish the youthful agents pen 5. 1. 236-237. The lighthearted element effectively relieves a portion of the gigantic strain that develops in the play. Act five in general is an awesome model since it is directly after the peak of the play and has what appears to me to be the best satire of the whole play. The second component of a satire that I am aware of is that it must have an upbeat completion. This is unquestionably what occurs in our play. Once Antonio was freed from his bond everybody got what they needed. Antonio caused Shylock to get Christian and Jessica and Lorenzo got a deed to Shylocks assets when he kicked the bucket. Above all Bassanio and Portia and Jessica and Gratiano settled the ring issues with positive feelings and shared comprehension. From what I have said in the past sections I need to group this play as a tragicomedy. The Merchant of Venice has the entirety of the components of satire that I have referenced. All through the play there is a huge measure of silliness. It comprises of both high satire and a smidgen of low parody as well. One case of the low parody would be toward the starting when Bassanio and Gratiano are in the bar with Antonio acting senseless. They are just worried about drinking brew and having some good times. A case of the high satire was when Portia was scrutinizing every last bit of her admirers. She taunted every last one of them with clever comments. My most loved of these comments was the point at which she answered to Nerissa about loving the Duke of Saxonys nephew, Very awfully in the first part of the day, when he is calm, and most terribly toward the evening, when he is flushed 2. 1. 84-85. This gave us a little insight as to Portias mind and cunning. This play is likewise steady with my explanation that a parody must have a cheerful consummation. There! was a pleasant air about the characters in the last scene. They all settled any issues that were available so we would be left with a total feeling of conclusion. I have revealed to you why I feel that the play is incompletely a parody and now to inform you concerning the heartbreaking component. A catastrophe has a shocking legend which for this situation is Shylock. I don't feel that with a character as deplorable as him in the play that we can disregard him. He was wronged such a great amount in the play that it is difficult to recollect those offenses. Above all else he was constantly singled out and despised by everybody. Antonio spat on him and kicked him like a canine. Another case of his awfulness was when Jessica fled from him. This furious him incredibly on the grounds that she fled with a Christian. Be that as it may, his fundamental concern was the entirety of the wealth that she had taken from him. He thought more about his assets than he did about his girl. A last way that Shylock was wronged was when Antonio was discharged from the bond. In the event that Shylock was a decent Christian man there would not have been a discussion. He presumably would have been permitted to take the pound of substance. The last motivation behind why this play could be viewed as a disaster is on the grounds that Shylock was embarrassed. This is an important piece of an unfortunate saints character. For the entirety of the reasons that I have expressed in the above sections this play must be viewed as a tragicomedy. It doesn't fit a solitary arrangement of standards. Rather it has numerous comic components and a tad bit of the lamentable components. On the off chance that Shylocks character was not all that engaged with the story I would group the play as a satire. Since he has such a significant job I think that its difficult to overlook his shocking characteristics. 6 The Merchant of Venice is an extraordinary play and I delighted in it without a doubt. As we read through the play I began to see something that was diverse about it. From the outset I couldn't place it. At that point it began to turn into a little more clear. During our conversations I began to see that different people groups transl ations of the play were unique in relation to mine. I tuned in to what the others said and it seemed well and good. Thusly I began to feel that perhaps I was to blame and had confounded it. At that point the following day it happened once more. I started to think about whether I was accomplishing something incorrectly. That was the point at which I truly began to feel that there was something special about this play. I didn't utter a word in class about my contemplations since they appeared to be somewhat strange, even to me. All things considered, I had never known about a play having two unique methods of understanding it. My doubts continued for two or three weeks and that was the point at which I turned out to be very cheerful. Dr. Lipkind came into our group and t! alked to us about the play. He was in his standard character, arms thrashing and voice blasting, when he revealed to us that this play could be perused two totally various ways. I could at last inhale a murmur of help. It was truly baffling for me to question my own contemplations. For during the class conversations I was persistently re-thinking myself and I didn't care for this inclination. After Dr. Lipkind revealed to us this reality he disclosed to us that numerous specialists had various assessments about this. Some said that this twofold sided story was unfortunate and frail. They felt this was basically an instance of a scholars hesitation and absence of capacity. Different specialists imagined that this twofold sidedness was the plays most prominent resource. They differ with respect to how savvy Shakespeare was and on the off chance that he expected to do this deliberately or on the off chance that it was just a mishap. I am slanted to concur with the specialists that think Shakespeare was a splendid author in his time. He would even be viewed as one of the absolute best scholars ever. Shakespeare has composed incalculable sonnets and plays. Not every one of them are a portrayal of his absolute best work however that doesn't make a difference. To be an incredible author, in any event in my brain, an individual just needs to create two bits of writing that are of a high bore. Shakespeare did this. One of those extraordinary plays was Julius Caesar. I read this play a year ago and appreciated it without a doubt. They way that he set up the scenes was magnificent. All through the play he built up the plots and sub-plots while proceeding to keep the play energizing and engaging. He never let the crowd get exhausted. There are a few different plays that he composed that were of an extremely high gauge. He additionally composed sonnets. His Shakespearean poems are exceptionally intriguing in light of the fact that they constantly utilized a similar rhyme conspire. In the event that this man had this ability I don't imagine that any individual would debate his significance and state that one of his plays was feeble. Besides, I don't feel that anybody could state that such an extraordinary wr! iter basically composed a twofold sided play on mishap. Shakespeare did purposefully compose this play with the goal that it could be perused two different ways. As I referenced before I had deciphered numerous pieces of this play uniquely in contrast to huge numbers of my schoolmates. One case of this was when Bassanio and his companions met Antonio in the principal scene of the play. The vast majority of the others in the class didn't appreciate them. They imagined that they were comedians and nearly derided them. Be that as it may, I believed that they were simply making some great memories. I don't discover anything amiss with a couple folks becoming inebriated and making some great memories, inasmuch as they don't harm anyone all the while or drink while they are riding a pony or working substantial hardware. Another case of how this play can be perused two distinct ways includes Shylocks happy bond. During a class conversation with Dr. Lipkind I said that I thought Shylock was arranging retribution from the earliest starting point. When given this perspective a significant part of the class concurred with me. Dr. Lipkind instructed us to watch this circumstance create and

Whats a Golden Parachute (And How Its Used in MA)

Whats a Golden Parachute (And How Its Used in MA) Do you have a golden parachute?There can only be three answers to this question. “Yes,” “No” or “I don’t know.”The first two answers are clear enough. But if your answer is “I don’t know,” then you most likely don’t have one.Just like a normal parachute, a golden parachute is meant to provide you with safety.However, it’s not a normal parachute which happens to be made of gold. Or gold plated. Or gold colored.A golden parachute is simply an agreement. More precisely, it is a clause in an employment contract or agreement.Unlike the other clauses, more commonly referred to as the terms of employment, a golden parachute has a unique purpose.Also, it’s only in the contracts of certain employees and not all.In any case, isn’t the nature of gold such that you can’t find it everywhere?Golden parachutes are the preserve of top executives in big companies, especially CEOs. In some cases, the companies may not necessarily be big, but may be operating in highly-com petitive environments or industries.The clause lists the benefits which a top executive should receive from an employer in the event of termination of employment.Though there can be different reasons for termination, a major reason envisioned when drafting these clauses is a merger or acquisition.Some BackgroundThis is the case because during mergers and acquisitions, the control of the company usually changes.When a new company takes over your company, rarely will the top management be left intact.The person or company taking over your company will have a preferred way of doing things.A different way of running the company will mean a new set of managers, especially at the top. Different decisions have to be made going forward.Whereas this is good for the individuals being entrusted with the running of the company, it is bad news for the leaving executives. To them, they have lost a job. Losing a job is not easy.Lacking a sustainable source of income affects your life. Unless you h ad planned for it accordingly.One characteristic of the top position in a company is risk taking. Top managers are employed to make the hard decisions and take (calculated) risks.Being human, they could make decisions which end up being big mistakes. These could lead to huge losses, or even a shutdown.Such results often lead to job loss.This makes top executives afraid of making some decisions because they are afraid of the repercussions in case things don’t go well.But their indecision is also a potential loss of great opportunities.Top managers are people who flourish as risk takers.But if they are faced with difficult choices between taking a risk and losing their jobs, it is obvious which one they will go for.To enable the manager feel comfortable and free to make the decisions he needs to make, a generous perk is provided to cushion him in case he gets terminated.Golden Parachute vs. Golden HandshakeAnother common term, perhaps more common than the golden parachute, is the go lden handshake.Although both the parachute and the handshake are golden, there is a difference.Whereas a golden parachute includes a generous severance package, cash bonuses and stock options, the handshake goes further.A golden handshake adds the retirement benefits to this termination package. The retirement benefits are those to be given if you are to retire when working in the same company.Generally, retirement packages are very generous.At the same time, golden parachutes come with many benefits. When these two are put together, the result is the golden handshake.As a result, the golden handshake provides more benefits than the parachute alone.Golden Parachute vs. Golden HandcuffA golden handcuff works differently from the parachute.While the golden parachute is intended to provide a soft landing for you when terminated, the golden handcuff is meant to stop you from leaving the company.This is done by putting together great benefits and some costs. The benefits are for staying and the costs are for leaving within a certain period. This is especially the case when you could leave and join a competitor.For example, if you leave, you would be required to return some company assets initially given to you. It can also take the form of a greatly-reduced severance pay.ADVANTAGES OF GOLDEN PARACHUTEGolden parachutes have been hailed for their benefits.The benefits here are not from the perspective of the recipients, but the company and the staff remaining behind after the CEO leaves.As such, some people have rooted for them.Moreover, for the companies in acquisition-prone environments, this is seen as a good solution.Some of the advantages are:Ease in hiring and retaining top talent.It is easier to hire employees in the low and middle levels as opposed to higher levels.This may not make much sense if you consider that there are more candidates at lower levels compared to higher levels.Still, hiring a C-suite employee is more daunting than lower-level employees. T he reason is quite simple. These individuals look for job security more than anyone else.They want to be sure that they have the authority to make decisions without being afraid of losing their jobs.Since these are the people who are relied on to drive the company forward, you have to create a conducive environment for them. You have to provide attractive perks and these are never cheap.Since mergers and acquisitions often lead to a change of guard at the top, CEOs often get replaced.As job candidates, these CEOs always consider the company approaching them for a position. Or if applying, they will consider the termination package before making the application.The company providing great benefits will attract the greatest minds. And those benefits prevent the CEOs from leaving for a similar position in a competing company. Keeps top executives objective during merger and acquisition talks.Talks about mergers and acquisition are not easy. Emotions flare up and resentment builds up. F riends can easily become enemies because people on both sides of the table have interests to protect.But mergers don’t happen for the interests of the top managers. They often happen for the interest of the business.The business may be dying and can only be resuscitated through an acquisition. Such a move could also be the initiative of shareholders.Remember that the CEO needs job security like everyone else? And he doesn’t want to lose the big salary?Many times, CEOs and other top managers try to thwart acquisition or merger plans. They can do this by making it difficult to reach an agreement.Where a CEO is assured of a hefty send-off package, he is more likely to act in the best interests of the company. This is because his interests are already taken care of.Discourage hostile take-overs.Golden parachutes are a big expense to the company.And when a company is being bought, the acquiring company is responsible for paying out the golden parachute. As such, this can present a ch allenge to the acquirer.Considering that business are started with the intention of withstanding competition and being successful, it becomes wise to safeguard it against hostile moves.Because these payoffs run into millions of dollars, they are at times put in place to discourage acquisitions.To prevent a business take-over from a hostile competitor, many companies will include a golden parachute in the top manager’s contract.Since this is an expense to be borne by the acquiring company, they will have to consider this as the cost of replacing the management.Top managers also take a lot of responsibility in the running of the company.This leads them to eventually developing a personal sense of ownership of the company.If it grows, they are proud of it. If it fails, they feel the shame and embarrassment.In such an environment, the management will not necessarily want an acquisition to happen.When there is a golden parachute in place, buying out the company adds to the total cost a nd the move may prove too expensive.Prevent employee retaliation after termination.Another big reason for these hefty packages is   to prevent retaliation by former high-ranking employees.Retaliation can be dangerous for the company considering that the employee has the knowledge of how you run your operations.When you fire a CEO, your business might get into serious trouble if he decides to retaliate. There are two major ways he may act against you depending on the circumstances of his departure.1. Suing â€" this is a common route taken by disgruntled former employees. Their complaints may be valid or otherwise. But the process itself has many effects.He may sue you for unlawful termination, unfair treatment or any other reason he decides to use. And since you are the perpetrator of the alleged crime, the suit may ask that you pay for the costs involved in the case.When you are taken to court by a former manager, you can expect that this will cause a stir. It will be the topic of d iscussion among your employees.Also, especially if you are a big company, you are bound to attract lots of negative media attention.Of all the things that could happen, losing such a case is the worst. This will not only confirm all the allegations from the former staff, but will also force you to pay huge amounts of money.In an effort to prevent a situation like this, companies use golden parachutes. They make the deal so good that an employee will not have a problem being fired. Though he may not like it, he will actually see no loss as the benefits given are good.2. Disclosure â€" another problematic scenario is when the terminated staff decides to let your competitor in on your trade secrets. This can cause adverse effects on your business.With the knowledge the former staff has, he can help your competitors bring you down quite easily. This is why employees are directed to sign an NDA (Non Disclosure Agreement).Although it is in good faith, the agreement can be broken. And when someone does that, especially when he is no longer your employee, it can be tragic for your business.Your competitor may know the terms you have with suppliers which allow you more cash flow. They may also get to know how much you pay your best employees.From this information, they may poach your best talent and lure them with a better pay or benefits.So much loss can be experienced as a result of disclosure. This is one reason for the inclusion of a golden parachute in the contract of the CEO.DISADVANTAGES OF GOLDEN PARACHUTEGood as they may be, golden parachutes are surrounded by controversies.These controversies mainly revolve around the huge amounts of cash payments and other benefits provided for the terminated employees.Perhaps worse than that, is the fact that these agreements are rarely known by the shareholders.Essentially being the owners of the companies, shareholders are often the ones speaking out loudest against these packages. Here are some disadvantages.CEOs are alr eady highly-paid.This is a fact in all companies. Although different companies pay their top managers differently, these employees are definitely the most highly-paid.Consider the 25 most highly-paid CEOs as at March 2019. Click on the image for the full report. Source: squarespace.comAs such, a generous payoff after termination is seen as unnecessary.For the purposes of securing a comfortable life after termination, it is argued that their high pay can accommodate enough savings and investments.This becomes more of an issue when the pay of other staff is compared to that of the managers.There is always a big difference between the salaries of all staff. And so when the highest-paid is given a big send-off package, it simply doesn’t go well with low income earners.Executives should naturally act in the company’s best interest.This is the argument against the idea that a golden parachute enables the CEO to be objective during acquisition talks.Opponents of golden parachutes claim that the CEO was running the company with its best interests at heart.If the company is being bought by another, then he should not shift his loyalty from the company to himself.Although this is a noble view of the CEO, its truthfulness is largely determined by e thics and integrity. Of course, these are traits which all CEOs should have.But when one’s own interests are threatened, you can never be sure how they will respond.At the same time, this argument shows the potential human frailty in everyone. It may thus seem that without external motivation, prioritizing other people’s interests is not easy.Golden parachutes may not necessarily prevent a take-over.As expensive as golden parachutes are, they are usually only a small fraction of the total cost of an acquisition.The costs involved in acquisitions are far above the expense of the golden parachute in question.This fact weakens the argument that these packages will prevent a hostile take-over. Instead, they are viewed as having very little impact in trying to prevent it.Here’s a video of how a hostile take-over happens. In many cases, golden parachutes constitute of three or more years’ annual pay of the executive plus other benefits.These benefits generally include stock option s and a generous severance pay. The acquisition cost on the other hand may include the value of all company assets.Comparing these costs, you will find that the individual or company buying an existing business has enough money or motivation to pay the package.So, though it was meant to deter a take-over, it ends up being unable to serve its purpose.May possibly reduce the company’s profitability.As an expense being paid out, golden parachutes affect the financial status of the company. Where cash bonuses are involved, lots of cash will be paid out.Where large amounts of stocks are given, more money will be paid out when paying dividends.Above all, the severance pay may be what digs deepest into the company’s cash reserves. Low amounts of cash affect a company’s ability to run its operations comfortably.It may impact important operations, prevent it from taking advantage of opportunities and indirectly impact on profitability.May lead to the CEO’s poor performance.Golden par achutes may have a very negative effect on the performance of the CEO entitled to it.Since there are huge amounts of cash and generous benefits involved, the executive may develop the wrong attitude towards work.He may not see the need to work hard or put his best foot forward. He may become reluctant to make tough choices and give a lackluster performance since he has nothing to lose.The real factors affecting the performance of the top managers may not be clearly known to the shareholders and other employees.That however does not stop them from discussing how he is under-performing. All that many people care to look at is the overall growth trend of the company.If the company is growing, employees and shareholders want to feel it. This is by getting higher dividends, share prices going up and staff salaries being increased.If these things are not happening, then as far as others are concerned, there should be a change at the top.May cause animosity and resentment among staff.By al l means, some send-off packages have been outrageously big. The cash and bonuses have been high, not to mention the other benefits included in the deals. Often, the revelation of these packages leads to an outcry by employees.When it becomes known that this the treatment given to top managers while other employees complain of low earnings, resentment can easily build among employees.This will be seen as a sign of favoritism and unfair treatment.If not handled properly, animosity may be the outcome.This creates a negative work environment and business growth may become more of a dream than a reality.CONCLUSIONGolden parachutes have arguments both for and against them.If you are in a position to determine whether to implement one for your CEO, keep in mind the pros and cons.This will help you balance everything accordingly and hopefully keep everyone happy.